If you copy & paste Navajo Generating Station web address into your browser, you’ll be taken to the U.S. Department of the Interior’s website about Navajo Generating Station, including the “historic” agreement between NGS stakeholders/Salt River Project, the Navajo Nation, Gila River Indian Tribe, Interior, and others. There’s also a place where you can submit your email address to receive updates on the Joint Federal NGS Working Group.
Navajo Generating Station
http://www.doi.gov/navajo-gss/index.cfm
I’ve included the email from the U.S. Interior Department announcing the NGS-Joint Working Group, Bureau of Reclamation Water Rights Office/NGS-Joint-WR, BOR WRO announcing the first update from the Interior, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency, which is also known as the Federal Navajo Generating Station Working Group, about their latest attempt to justify why three agencies of the U.S. government have teamed up to justify the continued existence of the eighth largest coal-fire generating plant in the nation.
The EPA, in 2011, proposed to require NGS to install about $1.1 billion worth of pollution controls, which would bring the 40-year-old plant into compliance with the EPA’s first national Mercury and Air Toxic Standards “to protect American families from power plant emissions of mercury and toxic air pollution like arsenic, acid gas, nickel, selenium, and cyanide. The standards will slash emissions of these dangerous pollutants by relying on widely available, proven pollution controls that are already in use at more than half of the nation’s coal-fired power plants.
“EPA estimates that the new safeguards will prevent as many as 11,000 premature deaths and 4,700 heart attacks a year. The standards will also help America’s children grow up healthier – preventing 130,000 cases of childhood asthma symptoms and about 6,300 fewer cases of acute bronchitis among children each year.
“By cutting emissions that are linked to developmental disorders and respiratory illnesses like asthma, these standards represent a major victory for clean air and public health– and especially for the health of our children. With these standards that were two decades in the making, EPA is rounding out a year of incredible progress on clean air in America with another action that will benefit the American people for years to come,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards will protect millions of families and children from harmful and costly air pollution and provide the American people with health benefits that far outweigh the costs of compliance.”
“Since toxic air pollution from power plants can make people sick and cut lives short, the new Mercury and Air Toxics Standards are a huge victory for public health,” said Albert A. Rizzo, MD, national volunteer chair of the American Lung Association, and pulmonary and critical care physician in Newark, Delaware. “The Lung Association expects all oil and coal-fired power plants to act now to protect all Americans, especially our children, from the health risks imposed by these dangerous air pollutants.”
Copy & paste into your browser: http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/bd8b3f37edf5716d8525796d005dd086!
But political pressure from Congress, Navajo Prez Shelly and the Hopi Council forced the EPA to forget it’s stand to protect the health of children and to stand with the Interior Department and Department of Energy to protect NGS, jobs and money.
Copy & paste into your browser:
http://naturalresources.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=242724
At the (2011) Congressional hearing, the President of the Navajo Nation, Ben Shelly, discussed how the NGS has spent over $650 million on environmental control technology to proactively address concerns and explained that, “NGS is an essential component of the Navajo Nation’s economy and our energy portfolio, and must remain viable, for the sake of the Nation and our People, for years to come.”
On July 30, 2013, Shelly stood proudly with his NGS negotiating team, Navajo Council Speaker Johnny Naize and C0-Negotiating Team leader Navajo Nation Attorney General Harrison Tsosie after signing the 25-year NGS lease renewal. In 2011, Shelly made it clear that he supported NGS and so it’s clear that his negotiating team, which was headed by the tribal attorney general, negotiated for NGS, not the Navajo children.
From: “NGS-Joint-WG, BOR WRO”
Date: July 31, 2013 11:19:19 AM MDT
To: BOR WRO NGS-Joint-WG
Subject: July 2013 Update from the Joint Federal Navajo Generating Station Working Group
To: All Navajo Generating Station Stakeholders
Subject: July 2013 Update from the Joint Federal Navajo Generating Station Working Group
This email is the first of what we expect will be periodic updates from the three agencies involved in the Federal Navajo Generating Station (NGS) working group. The Federal NGS working group was formed as the result of a joint statement signed in January 2013 by the Secretaries of the Department of the Interior (Interior) and Department of Energy (DOE), and the Administrator of EPA (EPA) (Joint Statement).
The purpose of the Federal NGS working group is to help collect sound, scientifically based information on issues relating to NGS for the Federal Government, and to help ensure that the three agencies work with stakeholders to complete a roadmap for the long-term future of NGS.
During the initial development period, the Federal NGS working group has begun meeting to educate and focus all Federal partners on the complex issues surrounding NGS, and to develop a process for implementing the 3-agency Joint Statement.
We have also set up a website to provide background information about the working group and NGS, including a copy of the three agency Joint Statement, as well as links to other important federal sources of information about NGS and the working group.
The three agencies recognize that NGS is important to a large number of Tribes, people, businesses, cities and towns, and others in Arizona and beyond. Some of these people and organizations share the same interests regarding NGS; others have different or even conflicting interests.
We recognize that addressing all of these issues wisely is both very important and very challenging. Reliable information and input from stakeholders on possible options and their impacts will be essential in these discussions.
As a result, the Federal NGS working group has agreed that completing a scientific study on clean energy options for NGS and its many stakeholders is the first step towards developing a meaningful roadmap for the future of NGS. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) NGS Phase 2 Study will constitute this initiative (NREL is a DOE sponsored technology laboratory).
NREL staff and other representatives from the three agencies are in the process of identifying the scope of the NREL Phase 2 Study. Besides studying roadmap options for the long-term future of NGS, the NREL Phase 2 Study will also include several related near-term initiatives to address other actions and objectives identified in the Joint Statement.
We expect to be able to provide additional information about this effort soon, including how stakeholders affected by potential changes at NGS can provide input into the scope of the Phase 2 Study and its various components.
The Phase 2 Study initiative may result in a series of published technical reports that would be prepared at the completion of each key section of the analysis. There will be additional opportunities to provide input to the federal NGS working group as well.
Apart from the efforts being initiated by the Federal NGS working group, there are also two additional upcoming opportunities to comment on specific Federal agency actions related to NGS.
First, EPA has proposed a Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Rule for NGS to comply with the Regional Haze Rule and the visibility protection requirements of the Clean Air Act.
The comment period for EPA’s proposed BART Rule is currently open and will remain open untilOctober 4, 2013. The proposed rule would limit emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from NGS that impact visibility – including at 8 national parks and 3 wilderness areas – and also affect human health throughout the region.
EPA intends to hold five public hearings in Arizona on the proposed BART Rule. More information about the proposed BART Rule, including a copy of the proposal and how to comment on it can be found on EPA’s Region 9 website.
On July 26, 2013, a Technical Working Group that includes representatives of Salt River Project, Interior, the Navajo Nation, the Gila River Indian Community, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Western Resource Advocates, and the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, submitted a Reasonable Progress Alternative to BART to EPA for consideration as a supplemental proposal to EPA’s original BART proposal.
If, after reviewing the Alternative, EPA determines that it meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act and Regional Haze Rule, it will publish this Reasonable Progress Alternative as a supplemental BART alternative for NGS and invite members of the public to comment on it.
Second, Interior expects to initiate preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) later this year addressing the potential impacts that may result from Federal actions required to renew and revise leases, rights of way grants, and permits for NGS, and the life-of-mine permit revision for the Kayenta Mine Complex, which supplies the coal used at NGS.
The leases and rights of way begin to expire in 2019, and the terms of the new leases and right of way renewals are currently being considered by the relevant parties. We will share additional information about preparation of the EIS and public participation opportunities related to the EIS once it becomes available.
As new information becomes available, we will update the website. If you have suggestions for revisions to the website, please forward them to the email address listed below.
Letty Belin
Counselor to the Deputy Secretary, Department of the Interior
Chair, Joint Federal Navajo Generating Station Working Group
email: ngs-joint-wg@usbr.gov
Joint work group website – http://www.doi.gov/navajo-gss/index.cfm
EPA’s Region 9 website – http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/navajo/